Dec. 7, 2024

Old Testament: Morality Tale?

Old Testament: Morality Tale?

A Look at how some read and preach the Old Testament like it’s a morality tale?

A Look at how some read and preach the Old Testament like it’s a morality tale?

WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.279 --> 00:00:06.040
Looking at our world from a theological perspective. This is

2
00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:13.359
the Theology Central podcast, making Theology Central. Good afternoon, good

3
00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:18.519
early evening everyone. It is Friday, December sixth, twenty twenty four.

4
00:00:19.039 --> 00:00:22.480
It is currently five point thirty seven pm Central Time,

5
00:00:22.879 --> 00:00:25.399
and I am coming to you live from the Theology

6
00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:32.600
Central studio located right here in Abilene, Texas. Now, if

7
00:00:32.640 --> 00:00:36.840
you listen to a lot of sermons, I will argue

8
00:00:37.479 --> 00:00:42.119
that over and over again. When it comes to historical

9
00:00:42.200 --> 00:00:45.039
narratives in the Bible, I say, you find us mainly

10
00:00:45.159 --> 00:00:48.039
and well, I don't say mainly, you find it a

11
00:00:48.039 --> 00:00:51.240
lot in the Old Testament. Any of the historical narratives

12
00:00:51.240 --> 00:00:53.039
in the Old Testament, I think people I think they

13
00:00:53.079 --> 00:00:54.880
do the same thing with some of the Gospels and

14
00:00:54.920 --> 00:00:58.759
the Book of Acts. But wherever you have something written

15
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:01.600
as a narrative in any way, shape or form, I

16
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:03.520
say a time and time again, I think this is

17
00:01:03.719 --> 00:01:06.239
fairly common. I don't think anyone could argue with me

18
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:10.719
too much. I think pastors have a tendency to take

19
00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:12.879
parts of the Old Testament, parts of the New Testament,

20
00:01:12.879 --> 00:01:16.439
anything that's more like in a narrative format, and they

21
00:01:16.519 --> 00:01:20.159
will preach it and they will teach it as if

22
00:01:20.200 --> 00:01:26.959
it's a morality tell, a morality tell. And I'm going

23
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:32.200
to challenge that approach to preaching and to Bible interpretation,

24
00:01:32.879 --> 00:01:36.519
because I don't believe the Bible was written to serve

25
00:01:36.640 --> 00:01:40.200
as a morality tale. I think when we approach that,

26
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:43.519
we handle the text that way, approach it that way,

27
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:47.359
read it that way, I think we do great damage

28
00:01:47.799 --> 00:01:52.359
to actually a true understanding of scripture. That's going to

29
00:01:52.400 --> 00:01:56.040
be my hypotheses. The Bible should not be read as

30
00:01:56.079 --> 00:01:59.879
a morality tale. It should not be preached as a

31
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:05.120
morality tell. I will argue that most kids who grow

32
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:08.120
up in church and go to Sunday school, Sunday school class,

33
00:02:08.159 --> 00:02:11.120
after Sunday school class, after Sunday school class, are Bible

34
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:17.560
stories taught as morality tales, which then absolutely destroys those

35
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:21.960
kids' ability to ever truly understand the Bible. I will

36
00:02:22.000 --> 00:02:26.280
say that in most cases, the children's ministries and most

37
00:02:26.400 --> 00:02:33.439
churches are actually hurtful and damaging the children's ability to

38
00:02:33.560 --> 00:02:36.960
understand the scriptures as they get older. I think if

39
00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:40.479
you take most kids who are raised in the church

40
00:02:40.840 --> 00:02:43.719
and ask them about Christianity and ask them about the Bible.

41
00:02:43.759 --> 00:02:47.719
They will start talking about the Bible as a morality tale.

42
00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:52.199
They'll start talking about Christianity as basically just moralism, as

43
00:02:52.319 --> 00:02:55.280
just a system of morality. Do this, don't do this,

44
00:02:55.479 --> 00:02:57.919
do this, don't do this, This is bad, this is good,

45
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:01.199
don't do this, don't say that. And it's all about

46
00:03:01.280 --> 00:03:05.159
does and don't. It's morality, morality, morality, and every Bible

47
00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:09.400
story is just a morality tell. And I think that

48
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:14.159
that's actually destructive. I think that that's actually counterproductive to

49
00:03:15.159 --> 00:03:21.240
having people form the ability or to develop the ability

50
00:03:21.439 --> 00:03:26.520
to actually read and study the Bible. Now, I know

51
00:03:26.599 --> 00:03:29.879
immediately I'm gonna get some pushback on this, but I

52
00:03:29.960 --> 00:03:32.840
think it's a problem now for those who don't know

53
00:03:32.919 --> 00:03:36.840
it and know a good definition of what a morality

54
00:03:36.879 --> 00:03:40.439
tell is. Let me explain. A morality tell is a

55
00:03:40.520 --> 00:03:47.840
story that conveys a moral message or lesson, often by

56
00:03:47.879 --> 00:03:52.919
illustrating the consequences of good and bad behavior. Morality tales

57
00:03:52.960 --> 00:03:57.560
are characterized by simple plots and relatable characters. Morality tells

58
00:03:57.639 --> 00:04:03.840
use these to make complex ideas accessible and memorable. Typically,

59
00:04:03.919 --> 00:04:05.840
within a morality tell, not only do you have simple

60
00:04:05.840 --> 00:04:09.520
plots and relatable characters, you have a protagonist with a

61
00:04:09.719 --> 00:04:14.360
moral compass. The protagonist is either seeking redemption or wants

62
00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:18.319
to silence their inner conscience. Number three, you have a

63
00:04:18.399 --> 00:04:22.000
focus on the consequences of choices. The story focuses on

64
00:04:22.040 --> 00:04:25.639
the choices to act on behalf of ourselves or others,

65
00:04:25.759 --> 00:04:30.279
and the consequences of that choice. Now, I will think

66
00:04:30.439 --> 00:04:32.800
that as soon as you start hearing that definition, many

67
00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:34.000
of you are going to be like, well, the Bible

68
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:36.800
is one big morality tell because we have these stories

69
00:04:36.839 --> 00:04:43.000
that have simple plots, relatable characters. Right, they take maybe

70
00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:46.360
these big philological ideas, but they make them more accessible

71
00:04:46.439 --> 00:04:49.720
and rememorable. I mean pastors do that all the time.

72
00:04:50.120 --> 00:04:54.240
There's some philological point or point they want to make

73
00:04:54.319 --> 00:04:56.160
and that they're teaching from the New Testament. They'll go

74
00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:59.240
to the Old Testament. Take one of the stories to

75
00:04:59.319 --> 00:05:03.680
then make the story quote unquote accessible or memorable. Take

76
00:05:04.040 --> 00:05:06.399
to take the philological idea and make it accessible and

77
00:05:06.480 --> 00:05:10.959
memorable by using an Old Testament story. So many would

78
00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:13.360
be like, well, this describes the Bible. It has a

79
00:05:13.399 --> 00:05:15.680
protagonist with a moral compass. See, people will go to

80
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:19.079
the Bible. Oh, here's our protagonists, here's the good guy

81
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:22.279
in the story. It's David, it's this man, it's this man,

82
00:05:22.319 --> 00:05:27.639
it's Abraham, it's Moses. Right, And so then we teach

83
00:05:27.759 --> 00:05:34.759
this morality tell using this character. The story focus. The

84
00:05:34.920 --> 00:05:38.160
stories focus on the consequences of the choices. The story

85
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:41.480
focuses on the choices to act on behalf of ourselves

86
00:05:41.519 --> 00:05:45.000
or others, and the consequences of that choice. So they're like, hey,

87
00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:47.079
this person had this choice to make. Here's the choice

88
00:05:47.120 --> 00:05:50.279
they made. And so you can see that, at least

89
00:05:50.319 --> 00:05:52.600
to one level. You could say, well, the Bible is

90
00:05:52.639 --> 00:05:56.800
a morality tell, But I think that's us reading. We've

91
00:05:56.879 --> 00:06:01.920
been so brought up on morality details that we just

92
00:06:02.079 --> 00:06:05.319
read the Bible in that way, And I don't know

93
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:11.480
if that's the right way to read the stories. Morality

94
00:06:11.519 --> 00:06:15.240
tells were commonly used in early forms of information dissemination

95
00:06:15.600 --> 00:06:19.360
to teach values in ethics. They have remained a strong

96
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:25.680
influence in literature, inspiring modern works. Yeah, it has been

97
00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:29.519
a major influence on literature, and I will argue it's

98
00:06:29.560 --> 00:06:33.920
been a major influence within christiendom. Sunday school teachers just

99
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:38.680
want to turn Sunday school into a morality tale. Moralism moralism,

100
00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:41.519
and I don't know if that's the correct way to

101
00:06:41.639 --> 00:06:47.360
understand the Bible. Now we have been talking about now

102
00:06:47.399 --> 00:06:50.839
for a number of hours. First Samuel chapter twenty six.

103
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:54.639
Right we started reviewing a sermon. We didn't make it

104
00:06:54.680 --> 00:06:57.319
all the way through it. And remember this pastor took

105
00:06:57.360 --> 00:07:01.040
First Samuel twenty six, which is a story of Saul

106
00:07:01.519 --> 00:07:04.800
hunting down David. He wants to destroy David. He wants

107
00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:07.839
to kill David. He has about three thousand men with

108
00:07:07.920 --> 00:07:10.360
him and they find a place to camp, right, they

109
00:07:10.439 --> 00:07:13.639
need a place to camp, so they're camping out. David

110
00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.439
finds out that Saul is coming into the wilderness after him.

111
00:07:16.519 --> 00:07:18.920
He sends some spies. They figure out, oh, that's where

112
00:07:18.959 --> 00:07:22.839
Saul is camping out. David takes someone. They go into

113
00:07:22.920 --> 00:07:25.839
the camp. All the men are asleep. David just walks

114
00:07:25.839 --> 00:07:29.040
into the camp. They're all sleeping, three thousand men. Saul's

115
00:07:29.639 --> 00:07:33.720
a commander is there, Saul is there. David walks in

116
00:07:34.040 --> 00:07:37.519
and he finds Saul sleeping with the spear right there

117
00:07:37.639 --> 00:07:41.040
next to his head. And David has a choice. The

118
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:43.519
person with David is like, hey, just take that spear,

119
00:07:43.759 --> 00:07:46.759
kill Saul. And this is over all of this dramas over.

120
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:49.160
This man's been hunting you, trying to kill you. You

121
00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:51.920
could end it. You could solve all your problems right now.

122
00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:55.600
And David doesn't do it. And so the sermon that

123
00:07:55.639 --> 00:07:59.639
we heard turned this into a hypothetical. Hey, what would

124
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.839
you do if you're facing a situation where you could

125
00:08:01.920 --> 00:08:03.639
end all of your problems but you would have to

126
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:06.519
sin to do so. And it turns it basically into

127
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:10.000
a morality tale. David is the good guy. David didn't

128
00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:13.360
do it. We need to be like David, And it

129
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:16.920
was basically preached that way. Well, there were all kinds

130
00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:20.279
of problems with the message, and we've taken them apart.

131
00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:23.639
But one of the issues is when I read it,

132
00:08:23.680 --> 00:08:26.040
I think it's a morality tale. I think it's a

133
00:08:26.079 --> 00:08:29.079
morality tale. So I wanted to see if I was correct.

134
00:08:29.279 --> 00:08:32.519
And so what I did as I took the sermon,

135
00:08:33.080 --> 00:08:35.720
found the text file of the sermon, and I gave

136
00:08:35.759 --> 00:08:40.120
it to AI, and I asked AI to examine the

137
00:08:40.159 --> 00:08:43.159
sermon and tell me if this is an example of

138
00:08:43.240 --> 00:08:46.759
taking an old testament, a historical narrative and turning it

139
00:08:46.799 --> 00:08:51.080
into a morality tale. This is what AI said, Yes,

140
00:08:51.759 --> 00:08:55.080
the sermon in the attached file is an example of

141
00:08:55.120 --> 00:08:58.720
taking an Old Testament historical narrative and turning it into

142
00:08:59.080 --> 00:09:04.320
a morality tell. While this approach may be engaging and

143
00:09:04.440 --> 00:09:12.399
may provide practical application, it comes with a significant textual, logical,

144
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:20.360
and philological problem or problems plural. So AI is like, yeah,

145
00:09:20.440 --> 00:09:23.679
a lot of this. This may be engaging, but guess

146
00:09:23.679 --> 00:09:27.279
what it's gonna It's gonna cause problems logically, philologically, it's

147
00:09:27.320 --> 00:09:32.639
gonna cause problems. What are the problems? Uh uh? Textual problems, Textual, logical,

148
00:09:32.679 --> 00:09:36.519
and thiological problems. When you approach the text as a

149
00:09:36.720 --> 00:09:40.559
morality tell, you create these problems. But most people in

150
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:43.440
the church has no idea that these problems are occurring

151
00:09:43.559 --> 00:09:45.879
because they were especially if they were raised in the church.

152
00:09:46.080 --> 00:09:52.000
They just think the Bible's one morality, big morality tell Anyway,

153
00:09:52.679 --> 00:09:55.759
So I said, Okay, we need to criticize this, we

154
00:09:55.799 --> 00:09:58.399
need to analyze this, we need to see how this

155
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:02.840
is a problem. So let's start with the text textual problems. Right,

156
00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:05.080
So we have first Samuel twenty six. We have this

157
00:10:05.159 --> 00:10:08.200
story of Saul trying to kill David. Saul finds a

158
00:10:08.200 --> 00:10:11.440
place to camp David goes in, finds Saul sleeping there.

159
00:10:11.559 --> 00:10:13.399
He could take the spear, he could kill him. God

160
00:10:13.480 --> 00:10:15.240
is the one who put them all to sleep, which

161
00:10:15.279 --> 00:10:18.200
raises all kinds of questions. And then David doesn't do so,

162
00:10:18.240 --> 00:10:20.639
and he rides off and he's the hero because he

163
00:10:20.720 --> 00:10:23.200
didn't do this. Okay, great, Now what can we learn

164
00:10:23.279 --> 00:10:27.559
from it? We turn it into a morality tale. Well,

165
00:10:28.080 --> 00:10:31.360
if we do this from a textual perspective, the first

166
00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:33.080
thing we tend to do is we tend to ignore

167
00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:36.559
the historical context. So when we go to these stories

168
00:10:36.960 --> 00:10:39.799
and turn them into morality tales, we have a tendency

169
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:44.480
to ignore the historical context. Now, some pastors will mention

170
00:10:44.679 --> 00:10:48.480
the historical context, but ultimately they ignore it to create

171
00:10:48.519 --> 00:10:55.200
their morality tell You see, the Old Testament historical narratives

172
00:10:55.240 --> 00:10:59.759
like First Samuel twenty six are rooted in specific cultural,

173
00:11:00.519 --> 00:11:05.559
covenantal and redemptive context. So you turn it into a

174
00:11:05.600 --> 00:11:11.200
morality tale, you basically then ignore the cultural as how

175
00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:15.600
it relates to the covenant or covenants and its redemptive context.

176
00:11:17.000 --> 00:11:19.279
You see, when you turn the narrative into a general

177
00:11:19.399 --> 00:11:22.960
moral lesson, the sermon risks stripping the story of its

178
00:11:23.000 --> 00:11:27.879
historical and philological uniqueness. You destroy what the text is

179
00:11:27.919 --> 00:11:35.120
actually about. For example, David's refusal to harm Saul is

180
00:11:35.200 --> 00:11:39.679
tied to Saul's unique role as God's anointed king in Israel.

181
00:11:40.360 --> 00:11:44.039
There's a specific reason David doesn't do so. There's a

182
00:11:44.159 --> 00:11:49.240
very specific reason. This is God's anointed. Well, does the

183
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:51.840
Old Testament have something that could possibly happen to David

184
00:11:51.960 --> 00:11:55.720
if he harms God's anointed? If he kills God's anointed?

185
00:11:56.000 --> 00:11:58.440
Could there have been consequences that David could face. We

186
00:11:58.759 --> 00:12:01.039
turn it into oh, Dave, it was just such a

187
00:12:01.080 --> 00:12:02.840
great guy. Was he a great guy? Or is he

188
00:12:02.879 --> 00:12:05.720
thought hmm? If I kill the Lord's anointed? What does

189
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:09.480
that mean for me my future? Could I am I

190
00:12:09.559 --> 00:12:12.399
going to be king? I mean, nobody wants to talk

191
00:12:12.399 --> 00:12:15.480
about that, because see, that takes the the motive of

192
00:12:15.639 --> 00:12:22.159
David and turns it into maybe more questionable. See if

193
00:12:22.159 --> 00:12:26.759
we apply this directly to modern moral dilemmas fails to

194
00:12:26.840 --> 00:12:32.240
consider the specificity of the situation. See we forget, Well

195
00:12:32.240 --> 00:12:35.440
wait a minute, what so is David just like well,

196
00:12:36.159 --> 00:12:39.080
all authority is appointed by God, Therefore I can't do anything?

197
00:12:39.159 --> 00:12:41.879
Or is he thinking hmm? The Bible may seem to

198
00:12:41.879 --> 00:12:44.480
make it very clear if I touch the Lord's anointed

199
00:12:44.679 --> 00:12:47.639
or if I kill the Lord's anointed, there could be problems.

200
00:12:48.080 --> 00:12:50.679
It is his. We liked it. We love to make

201
00:12:50.759 --> 00:12:56.879
Bible characters very one dimensional good guy, bad guy, good

202
00:12:57.039 --> 00:13:00.679
good motives, bad motives, and instead of seeing them as

203
00:13:00.919 --> 00:13:12.080
complex human beings with all kinds of different motivations, so

204
00:13:12.200 --> 00:13:18.639
we ignore the historical context. Another thing we do is

205
00:13:18.759 --> 00:13:24.600
we kind of start cherry picking details. Do we not see?

206
00:13:24.679 --> 00:13:29.120
Morality tells focus on select details of the story while

207
00:13:29.159 --> 00:13:33.960
ignoring or minimizing others. For example, the sermon that we

208
00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:38.600
reviewed emphasizes David's restraint and sparing Saul, but does not

209
00:13:38.720 --> 00:13:41.639
account for David's failures in First Samuel twenty seven, which

210
00:13:41.679 --> 00:13:47.000
immediately follow and complicate the narrative. And First Samuel twenty seven,

211
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:50.360
David's out there killing people. Oh, he would not kill Saul,

212
00:13:50.480 --> 00:13:53.559
but he's got no problem killing these other people. Hm,

213
00:13:54.720 --> 00:13:57.879
why see see a morality tail is not going to

214
00:13:57.919 --> 00:14:00.240
try to figure out that? Why? Well, we'll just yeah, no.

215
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:02.679
When we preach for Samuel twenty seven, we're not now

216
00:14:02.759 --> 00:14:06.080
David's being bad. See now be like David in twenty six,

217
00:14:06.240 --> 00:14:08.600
but don't be like David in twenty seven. But wait

218
00:14:08.600 --> 00:14:11.399
a minute, why is David so so it seems he

219
00:14:11.440 --> 00:14:14.480
has no problem killing these people in twenty seven, but

220
00:14:14.559 --> 00:14:18.600
he can't kill Saul. That seems to indicate maybe there's

221
00:14:18.600 --> 00:14:22.519
something to his motivation here. I'm not saying there is.

222
00:14:23.200 --> 00:14:26.120
I'm not saying there isn't. I'm saying that. Then a

223
00:14:26.159 --> 00:14:29.120
good sermon would be like, so, why do we think

224
00:14:29.639 --> 00:14:33.039
do we have any anything in the Bible that David

225
00:14:33.039 --> 00:14:35.480
may have been aware of that made him go, I

226
00:14:35.519 --> 00:14:38.799
can't kill Saul? And it would have been for more

227
00:14:38.840 --> 00:14:43.799
maybe selfish reasons than godly reasons, because he has no

228
00:14:43.840 --> 00:14:54.240
problem killing people in twenty seven. Yes. No, Now see

229
00:14:53.840 --> 00:14:59.080
when we do this, right, when we cherry pick details,

230
00:14:59.759 --> 00:15:03.320
this selective focus distorts the fuller picture of David's character,

231
00:15:03.360 --> 00:15:05.879
in God's work, in his life, you begin to actually,

232
00:15:06.159 --> 00:15:10.480
you begin to just destroy the actual picture that's being painted.

233
00:15:12.159 --> 00:15:14.759
So when we turn the Bible into a moralitytail, we

234
00:15:14.879 --> 00:15:17.679
end up with textual problems. And the first thing we

235
00:15:17.720 --> 00:15:20.639
do is we ignore the historical context. And the second thing,

236
00:15:20.720 --> 00:15:24.080
we cherry pick details, which actually destroys what the text

237
00:15:24.159 --> 00:15:30.519
is actually say. Another thing I think we do when

238
00:15:30.559 --> 00:15:32.639
we turn it into our morality detail is I think

239
00:15:32.679 --> 00:15:37.039
we neglect the narrative's purpose. Now I think this is

240
00:15:37.080 --> 00:15:42.080
I think this is a key hermeneutical issue. Before you

241
00:15:42.159 --> 00:15:45.960
ever debate with anyone about some verses in the Bible,

242
00:15:47.159 --> 00:15:49.360
whenever you start, you know someone wants to argue and

243
00:15:49.399 --> 00:15:51.480
they want to quote some scripture. I think what you

244
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:54.159
should do is just say time out before we argue

245
00:15:54.200 --> 00:15:57.480
about the scripture, Before we even argue about how to

246
00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:00.840
interpret this scripture, should we not ask what is the

247
00:16:00.879 --> 00:16:04.919
purpose of this particular chapter in which this scripture is found.

248
00:16:05.320 --> 00:16:08.480
What is the particular purpose? What is this chapter actually

249
00:16:08.519 --> 00:16:12.080
trying to say? Because so many times we ignore the

250
00:16:12.120 --> 00:16:14.559
actual purpose of the narrative and we go to the

251
00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:17.360
text to make it say we use it for our

252
00:16:17.440 --> 00:16:21.200
own purpose. We can't bring our purpose to the text.

253
00:16:22.399 --> 00:16:25.919
The text had a purpose, what is it? That's what

254
00:16:26.039 --> 00:16:31.519
we have to discover. See Biblical narratives. I know this

255
00:16:31.559 --> 00:16:33.519
is going to come as a shock to all of

256
00:16:33.559 --> 00:16:36.559
the Sunday school teachers. Okay, but Biblical narratives are not

257
00:16:36.679 --> 00:16:42.440
primarily moral instruction. I know that goes against everything. Look,

258
00:16:42.480 --> 00:16:45.399
I know that look, even as a preacher when I

259
00:16:45.559 --> 00:16:47.240
was being taught to preach, I mean, that's how I

260
00:16:47.279 --> 00:16:50.000
kind of under you go. You got to outline the story,

261
00:16:50.159 --> 00:16:53.240
and you need three or four principles. And these principles

262
00:16:53.279 --> 00:16:54.679
are going to be like, do this, don't do this,

263
00:16:54.759 --> 00:16:57.600
do this, don't do this, do this. Everything is turned

264
00:16:57.639 --> 00:17:02.960
into moral instruction. Be better, don't do this, stop doing this.

265
00:17:06.079 --> 00:17:10.400
But the reality, the biblical narratives are actually philological accounts

266
00:17:10.440 --> 00:17:14.160
meant to reveal God's character, his covenant purpose, and his

267
00:17:14.319 --> 00:17:19.599
redemptive work. See when you moralize the text, what happens

268
00:17:19.640 --> 00:17:24.920
The preacher is actually obscuring the narrative's true philological intent.

269
00:17:25.960 --> 00:17:28.839
Nobody knows the actual theological intent. No one knows the

270
00:17:28.880 --> 00:17:31.559
actual intent of the passage because we've turned it into

271
00:17:31.559 --> 00:17:41.000
a morality tale. First Samuel twenty six is not about

272
00:17:41.079 --> 00:17:45.000
how believers should resist sin under pressure, but it is

273
00:17:45.039 --> 00:17:48.880
about God's sovereignty and preserving David as his chosen king.

274
00:17:49.799 --> 00:17:54.279
God has chosen David, God has made covenant promise, the

275
00:17:54.359 --> 00:17:58.119
dividic covenant. There's all these things surrounding David that that

276
00:17:58.359 --> 00:17:59.839
or it's going to come to play. Why we'd have

277
00:17:59.880 --> 00:18:01.720
to look at I'd have to go put it all

278
00:18:01.759 --> 00:18:05.079
in its proper historical or chronological order. But the point

279
00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:09.039
is we know ultimately God has chosen David, and from David,

280
00:18:09.079 --> 00:18:11.680
He's going to establish a dividic covenant from the line

281
00:18:11.720 --> 00:18:14.839
of David comes Christ. There's a specific purpose and reason.

282
00:18:15.079 --> 00:18:18.160
You can't just take David out and just try to

283
00:18:18.160 --> 00:18:21.160
make David like us. David is in a completely unique

284
00:18:21.440 --> 00:18:24.480
and special situation, just like the same thing with Israel

285
00:18:24.519 --> 00:18:27.279
over and over and over again, and a covenant relationship

286
00:18:27.279 --> 00:18:33.759
a unique situation. So when we turn it into our

287
00:18:33.799 --> 00:18:36.000
morality tail, we end up with textual problems. We end

288
00:18:36.079 --> 00:18:39.480
up ignoring the historical context, We actually cherry pick details,

289
00:18:39.559 --> 00:18:43.559
and we neglect the narrative's purpose. Then we run into

290
00:18:43.599 --> 00:18:49.920
logical problems. What happens is we oversimplify complex characters. We

291
00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:53.440
take complex character characters and we make them one dimensional.

292
00:18:53.720 --> 00:18:57.359
We oversimplify them. See, when you turn the narrative into

293
00:18:57.400 --> 00:19:01.839
a morality tale, you reduce the complexity of these individuals

294
00:19:02.000 --> 00:19:04.319
and you just make them, you know, kind of into

295
00:19:04.359 --> 00:19:08.960
a just kind of into a one dimensional David is righteous,

296
00:19:09.200 --> 00:19:12.119
David is a good guy. Now there will be some

297
00:19:12.240 --> 00:19:15.279
text you'll say, David is a bad guy. But it's

298
00:19:15.359 --> 00:19:19.680
not that simple, is it. Saul is the bad guy,

299
00:19:20.279 --> 00:19:22.519
David is the good guy. That's just we have to

300
00:19:22.640 --> 00:19:25.960
establish who's the good guy, who's the bad guy. So

301
00:19:26.279 --> 00:19:29.000
this is an oversimplification of what this happen. What happens

302
00:19:29.200 --> 00:19:31.759
we begin to ignore the nuance of their humanity and

303
00:19:31.799 --> 00:19:35.400
their spiritual struggles. No, we can These are not one

304
00:19:35.440 --> 00:19:38.000
dimensional human beings. I know. We may have a little

305
00:19:38.000 --> 00:19:40.160
picture of them hanging up in the Sunday school classroom

306
00:19:40.160 --> 00:19:41.880
that we put up on a board, and we just

307
00:19:42.119 --> 00:19:45.359
reduce them to a little you know, flannel graphe a

308
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:50.640
one dimensional person. These are complex human beings with good, bad,

309
00:19:51.079 --> 00:20:01.640
all kinds of motivations. David is shown as a model

310
00:20:01.640 --> 00:20:06.039
of moral restraint and sparing Saul, yet his despair and

311
00:20:06.119 --> 00:20:08.720
moral felings in First Samuel twenty seven are not addressed,

312
00:20:08.839 --> 00:20:13.200
creating an inconsistent portrait. Hey, David maybe looking like a

313
00:20:13.240 --> 00:20:15.240
great guy in First Samuel twenty six, but in twenty

314
00:20:15.279 --> 00:20:17.960
seven man, he's running for his life. He's scared, he

315
00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:21.240
doesn't trust God, and he kills people and he steals property.

316
00:20:24.400 --> 00:20:27.000
Not such a good guy. Wa Wait, how do you

317
00:20:27.079 --> 00:20:31.920
reconcile that. Now you could take that and go hmm.

318
00:20:32.480 --> 00:20:35.000
Then I wonder what was it? Why would he not

319
00:20:35.119 --> 00:20:39.559
kill Saul? Then I'm just asking a hypothetical question. See

320
00:20:39.559 --> 00:20:41.759
if I go to twenty seven, if he's so quick

321
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:44.119
to kill these people, why wouldn't he kill that person? Well,

322
00:20:44.160 --> 00:20:47.079
he wouldn't kill that person, he says, because he's the anointed.

323
00:20:47.319 --> 00:20:51.759
Well what was it about Saul being the anointed that

324
00:20:51.920 --> 00:20:54.720
kept David scared to kill? He had no problem killing

325
00:20:54.720 --> 00:20:57.920
other people, So what was it? There's something about the

326
00:20:57.960 --> 00:21:00.640
context here, There's something about the history here, there's something

327
00:21:00.680 --> 00:21:03.519
about the theology here that would help us better understand

328
00:21:03.519 --> 00:21:06.039
first Samuel twenty six. But in the sermon we reviewed,

329
00:21:06.119 --> 00:21:08.279
he didn't bother to go into any of that because

330
00:21:08.319 --> 00:21:15.200
it was a morality tale. So we end up with

331
00:21:15.480 --> 00:21:18.599
a logical problems because we oversimplify and we take these

332
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:22.039
complex characters when we make them one dimensional. Another thing

333
00:21:22.079 --> 00:21:26.200
is we create false dichotomies. See the sermon that we

334
00:21:26.240 --> 00:21:30.000
listen to presents a binary choice either commit one sin

335
00:21:30.079 --> 00:21:33.759
and suffering, or remain faithful and endoor suffering. However, real

336
00:21:33.799 --> 00:21:38.119
life moral dilemmas are often far more complex. Involving mixed motives,

337
00:21:38.440 --> 00:21:43.559
unintended consequences, and limited options. Things are not always so simple.

338
00:21:43.880 --> 00:21:47.160
We like to make the story, you know, very like

339
00:21:47.240 --> 00:21:51.160
this false dichotomy, very simple, very binary, very it's either

340
00:21:51.200 --> 00:21:54.640
this way or that way. And things are never that simple.

341
00:21:54.759 --> 00:21:59.079
It's always much more convoluted, messy and complicated. And I

342
00:21:59.079 --> 00:22:03.440
think we should the convoluted, the complex, and the messy

343
00:22:03.759 --> 00:22:06.480
in the Bible because then we are much more prepared

344
00:22:06.519 --> 00:22:09.480
to deal with the complicated, convoluted and messy in life.

345
00:22:10.359 --> 00:22:13.200
Don't reduce the Bible and make it into a one

346
00:22:13.240 --> 00:22:17.400
dimensional morality tale. Get into it where it's ugly and

347
00:22:17.440 --> 00:22:21.400
dirty and messy and confusing and confounding and frustrating and

348
00:22:21.440 --> 00:22:25.400
discouraging and depressing, and embrace all that it's there, because

349
00:22:25.400 --> 00:22:31.200
that's how life is. Ladies and gentlemen. But we've got

350
00:22:31.240 --> 00:22:33.200
to have good guys and bad guys. We'd have to.

351
00:22:33.279 --> 00:22:41.640
We have to reduce everything to this the most simple form. Now, listeners,

352
00:22:42.079 --> 00:22:44.799
then what will happen to listeners when they hear us

353
00:22:44.880 --> 00:22:47.720
create these false diconomies. They begin to feel guilt or

354
00:22:47.720 --> 00:22:51.039
confusion when their own moral struggle struggles do not fit

355
00:22:51.160 --> 00:22:54.960
neatly into such dichotomies. So the listener hears us tell

356
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:57.599
these morality tales, but then they get into life and

357
00:22:57.640 --> 00:23:00.960
it's not always so simple. It's much more complicated and

358
00:23:01.039 --> 00:23:04.160
confusing and convoluted, and so they feel guilt and shame

359
00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:07.240
and like, why can't it just be this simple? Because nothing,

360
00:23:07.319 --> 00:23:20.039
ever is another logical problem. So when we come to

361
00:23:20.039 --> 00:23:24.680
the logical problems, we've oversimplified these characters, we create false dichotomies,

362
00:23:24.759 --> 00:23:28.319
and then we begin to apply ancient situations to modern context,

363
00:23:28.559 --> 00:23:33.079
which really becomes majorly problematic. See the preacher assumes that

364
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:38.160
David's historical situation is and now is basically like ours

365
00:23:38.440 --> 00:23:44.559
and our modern ethical dilemmas. It says, it's basically like, hey,

366
00:23:44.640 --> 00:23:48.440
here's David's situation. It's just like our own modern ethical dilemmas.

367
00:23:48.720 --> 00:23:53.079
It's just the same. Well, this approach risks creating artificial

368
00:23:53.079 --> 00:23:57.759
parallels that do not hold up under scrutiny. David's refusal

369
00:23:57.799 --> 00:24:01.319
to kill Saul reflects a unique covenant relationship between God,

370
00:24:01.480 --> 00:24:05.680
David and Saul, which cannot be directly mapped onto modern

371
00:24:05.720 --> 00:24:11.200
scenarios like workplace conflicts or personal temptations. It's not the same.

372
00:24:11.640 --> 00:24:15.920
But we go to these ancient problems, these ancient situations,

373
00:24:16.039 --> 00:24:18.880
and we try to apply them to modern context. It

374
00:24:18.920 --> 00:24:22.079
may sound good in preaching. Everyone may write down the points,

375
00:24:22.240 --> 00:24:32.200
but it's not. It doesn't fit always. So there's the

376
00:24:32.240 --> 00:24:38.160
textual problems, there's the logical problems. What about the philological problems? Well,

377
00:24:39.839 --> 00:24:43.640
when we turn the Bible into a morality tale, is

378
00:24:43.680 --> 00:24:49.960
there not a danger of misrepresenting the Gospel? You see

379
00:24:49.960 --> 00:24:53.039
by focusing in First Samuel twenty six. If we focus

380
00:24:53.039 --> 00:24:56.079
on David as a moral example, the sermon risks sidelighting

381
00:24:56.119 --> 00:25:00.000
the Gospel's emphasis on grace and Christ's ultimate fulfillment of righteousness.

382
00:25:00.200 --> 00:25:03.279
The narrative is used primarily to teach what we should do,

383
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:07.880
rather than pointing to what God has done. See, hey,

384
00:25:08.079 --> 00:25:10.000
it turns into you should do this, and you should

385
00:25:10.039 --> 00:25:14.559
do this, not turn into well, God has done these

386
00:25:14.599 --> 00:25:18.079
things for us because we fel to do them. No, no, no,

387
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:21.279
it always turns into what we should do. Works works, works, works,

388
00:25:21.319 --> 00:25:28.039
works works. The sermon frames david action as a model

389
00:25:28.079 --> 00:25:31.200
for resisting temptation, but the Gospel calls us to look

390
00:25:31.200 --> 00:25:34.319
to Christ, the only one who perfectly resisted temptation and

391
00:25:34.359 --> 00:25:37.559
fulfilled the law on our behalf. See, we're like, hey, hey,

392
00:25:37.839 --> 00:25:40.440
you sometimes you're gonna find the spear and you're gonna

393
00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:42.920
want to use it. You're gonna want to kill this

394
00:25:43.039 --> 00:25:45.279
or stab this or no, no, no, don't do that.

395
00:25:45.440 --> 00:25:48.039
Be like David. David didn't do it well, and somehow

396
00:25:48.039 --> 00:25:50.920
that that's supposed to I guess, fix my sinful nature.

397
00:25:51.839 --> 00:25:54.920
Just remember David, who didn't take the spear and kill Saul.

398
00:25:55.079 --> 00:25:58.480
He's killing people in the very next chapter. So do

399
00:25:58.559 --> 00:26:00.519
you really want to say, David figure out how to

400
00:26:00.559 --> 00:26:04.599
overcome temptation. No, he kills a woman's husband later on.

401
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:09.240
So just stop that. We always think, oh, this story

402
00:26:09.319 --> 00:26:12.599
shows us how to overcome temptation, does it? Because that

403
00:26:12.720 --> 00:26:17.920
character falls fifteen other different ways. Maybe what it demonstrates

404
00:26:18.359 --> 00:26:26.680
is that ultimately we have to look to Christ. So

405
00:26:27.519 --> 00:26:31.000
it could misrepresent the Gospel. It could create a kind

406
00:26:31.039 --> 00:26:34.960
of a fight between moralism versus grace. See the Sermon

407
00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:38.599
on First Samuel twenty six. It emphasized human effort moral

408
00:26:38.640 --> 00:26:43.440
decision making, which can lead to moralism. It can teach

409
00:26:43.519 --> 00:26:45.960
that human obedience is the key to our right relationship

410
00:26:45.960 --> 00:26:49.240
with God. This undermines the theilological truth that salvation and

411
00:26:49.279 --> 00:26:54.480
sanctification are works of God's grace. I'm right with God

412
00:26:54.519 --> 00:26:57.200
because of what Christ did, not because of what I

413
00:26:57.240 --> 00:27:02.119
do or don't do. So then what happens Listeners may

414
00:27:02.119 --> 00:27:06.359
feel burdened by unrealistic expectations of moral perfection, neglecting the

415
00:27:06.440 --> 00:27:14.440
role of repentance, grace, and the work of Christ. That's

416
00:27:14.440 --> 00:27:21.079
a problem. Another problem here. Another philological problem is in

417
00:27:21.119 --> 00:27:24.000
that sermon. It could have been possibly even misusing the

418
00:27:24.000 --> 00:27:26.319
concept of typology, which I'm not even a fan of,

419
00:27:26.599 --> 00:27:29.640
because the sermon appears to make David a typological or

420
00:27:29.680 --> 00:27:35.720
typological figure of Christ, but only selectively and inconsistently. While

421
00:27:35.759 --> 00:27:38.720
it draws some connections between David and Jesus, it fails

422
00:27:38.759 --> 00:27:44.160
to to acknowledge David's flaws, which underscores the need for

423
00:27:44.200 --> 00:27:48.039
a perfect and sinless savior. David is portrayed as a

424
00:27:48.079 --> 00:27:51.680
christ like figure in resisting sin, but he subsequently fails

425
00:27:51.720 --> 00:27:54.200
in First Samuel twenty seven, which revealed that he is

426
00:27:54.240 --> 00:27:57.920
not the ultimate model of righteousness. Only Christ is. David

427
00:27:58.359 --> 00:28:02.960
is a man who from his line comes Christ, but

428
00:28:03.119 --> 00:28:06.079
he is not Christ. He is not perfect, he is

429
00:28:06.119 --> 00:28:09.599
not righteous, He is a sinful man who fails, and

430
00:28:09.640 --> 00:28:12.759
that's why we need the one who comes in his line,

431
00:28:12.759 --> 00:28:15.759
which is Christ, but David himself. We want to draw

432
00:28:15.799 --> 00:28:19.000
these pictures, but we only want to selectively draw the picture.

433
00:28:24.480 --> 00:28:27.519
Another problem is that is this approach. When you turn

434
00:28:27.559 --> 00:28:32.680
into a morality tale, you overemphasize human responsibility. The sermon

435
00:28:32.759 --> 00:28:37.599
highlights David's ability to choose righteous righteousness, potentially downplaying the

436
00:28:37.680 --> 00:28:42.920
role of God's sovereignty and preserving Biblical narratives often emphasize

437
00:28:42.920 --> 00:28:46.200
God's control over events even when human decisions are involved.

438
00:28:46.400 --> 00:28:49.240
See we want to turn it into David chose David

439
00:28:49.279 --> 00:28:51.480
could do the right thing, so you can do the

440
00:28:51.559 --> 00:28:54.880
right thing, which the then almost then we get into well,

441
00:28:54.880 --> 00:28:56.400
can then we do the right thing all the time,

442
00:28:56.440 --> 00:28:58.480
so then we don't really need Christ? Can we be perfect?

443
00:28:58.799 --> 00:29:01.960
All kinds of problems? The text wasn't so much about Again,

444
00:29:02.319 --> 00:29:06.039
maybe David's motives weren't as pure as we want them

445
00:29:06.079 --> 00:29:15.400
to be. If you look at the text, the deep

446
00:29:15.440 --> 00:29:19.200
sleep that falls on Saul's camp, all three thousand of them,

447
00:29:19.680 --> 00:29:23.680
that's an act of divine intervention and understands it underscores

448
00:29:23.720 --> 00:29:28.640
God's protection of David. The divine element is overshadowed by

449
00:29:28.640 --> 00:29:32.039
the sermon's focus on David's moral restraint. We forget God

450
00:29:32.319 --> 00:29:38.440
and we look at what David did. That's what happens

451
00:29:38.440 --> 00:29:41.759
in morality tell It becomes a story about people and

452
00:29:41.799 --> 00:29:50.920
not a story about God. So what happens if you

453
00:29:50.920 --> 00:29:55.680
approach the Bible as a morality tell Well, it can

454
00:29:55.759 --> 00:30:04.640
lead to unrealistic, unrealistic expectations. It presents David as an

455
00:30:04.720 --> 00:30:11.319
idolized are idealized, maybe not idolized, idealized. He becomes the

456
00:30:11.319 --> 00:30:16.559
perfect ideal He becomes the perfect example of a moral model.

457
00:30:18.599 --> 00:30:23.720
So you set unrealistic expectations for everyone in the church, who,

458
00:30:24.079 --> 00:30:27.359
just like David, are flawed and prone to sin. This

459
00:30:27.480 --> 00:30:30.680
leads to feelings of guilt, failure, and inadequacy. Hey, why

460
00:30:30.720 --> 00:30:33.400
can't you be like David? Why can't you be like

461
00:30:33.480 --> 00:30:38.200
this person? Wait? Just remember they are just like those people.

462
00:30:38.519 --> 00:30:41.519
They're flawed, but you don't let them. You only use

463
00:30:41.599 --> 00:30:44.440
the flaws certain times, but other times you just so

464
00:30:44.599 --> 00:30:48.000
build these people up into well what the people in

465
00:30:48.039 --> 00:30:51.000
the pew never are going to be. You even hear

466
00:30:51.160 --> 00:30:55.119
sometimes Christian songs and be like David, be like this,

467
00:30:55.319 --> 00:30:59.319
be like this, No, let's not be like them, because

468
00:30:59.480 --> 00:31:11.119
they're just as flawed as us. So that sermon turned

469
00:31:11.160 --> 00:31:13.519
it into a morality tale, and it asked the question,

470
00:31:13.599 --> 00:31:18.000
what if you could commit one sin to end all suffering? Well,

471
00:31:18.039 --> 00:31:20.559
guess what that sermon did. It oversimplified the reality of

472
00:31:20.599 --> 00:31:25.200
ongoing sin and the struggle to trust god fully. David

473
00:31:25.279 --> 00:31:27.880
was committing sin before first Samuel twenty six, who was

474
00:31:27.920 --> 00:31:31.480
committing sin after first Samuel twenty six? But we turned

475
00:31:31.519 --> 00:31:36.039
it into hey, hey, oh if just focus on one

476
00:31:36.119 --> 00:31:39.119
thing and don't do that one thing, and it just well, oh,

477
00:31:39.440 --> 00:31:41.720
so you know, if I can make all my problems

478
00:31:41.759 --> 00:31:44.359
of going away by not by committing this sin, Well

479
00:31:46.160 --> 00:31:52.319
the whole question becomes really becomes ridiculous, because why, well,

480
00:31:53.920 --> 00:31:57.000
we're already committing sin. So the sermon just ignored that

481
00:31:57.279 --> 00:32:07.839
entire concept. And when you focus on moral behavior, you

482
00:32:07.839 --> 00:32:10.799
can foster a works based mentality where righteousness is seen

483
00:32:10.799 --> 00:32:14.119
as primarily dependent on human effort rather than on the

484
00:32:14.160 --> 00:32:18.200
imputed righteousness that comes from Christ. So this what you

485
00:32:18.319 --> 00:32:30.200
almost promote a form of legalism. We need to stop

486
00:32:30.240 --> 00:32:33.680
with the morality tell the moralism, and we need to

487
00:32:33.720 --> 00:32:36.200
get back to approaching the scripture in a more fair

488
00:32:36.319 --> 00:32:42.039
and honest way, not ignoring what's going on. When you

489
00:32:42.119 --> 00:32:45.240
turn the Old Testament historical narratives into a morality tell,

490
00:32:45.559 --> 00:32:49.359
it creates significant textual, logical, and philological problems. It risks

491
00:32:49.359 --> 00:32:52.880
misrepresenting the purpose of the text, oversimplifying the complex realities,

492
00:32:53.039 --> 00:32:57.759
and promoting a works based approach to faith. If you

493
00:32:57.839 --> 00:33:00.799
wanted to take First Samuel twenty six instead of turning

494
00:33:00.839 --> 00:33:03.960
into a morality tale, we could focus on God's sovereignty

495
00:33:03.960 --> 00:33:07.160
and preserving David. Now, it's going to raise some philosophical questions,

496
00:33:07.160 --> 00:33:10.319
but clearly the text emphasizes that we could show the

497
00:33:10.359 --> 00:33:14.200
contrast between David's flaws and Christ's perfection. Even in First

498
00:33:14.200 --> 00:33:16.480
Samuel twenty six, David looks like a great guy. But

499
00:33:16.880 --> 00:33:19.480
we want to just briefly mention chapter twenty seven, where

500
00:33:19.720 --> 00:33:24.039
you know, yeah, he's flawed. It could demonstrate that all

501
00:33:24.079 --> 00:33:28.319
of us, including David, need grace because we live a

502
00:33:28.440 --> 00:33:33.119
life filled with human weakness, frailty, sin and doubt and

503
00:33:33.200 --> 00:33:38.039
all the other things that happens to us. Now, if

504
00:33:38.079 --> 00:33:41.160
you approach it more this way, you're being more realistic.

505
00:33:41.160 --> 00:33:44.599
You're being realistic about who David was you're being realistic

506
00:33:44.759 --> 00:33:48.759
about the complexities in the text. You don't just reduce

507
00:33:48.799 --> 00:33:51.880
it to this one dimensional Be good guys, don't be

508
00:33:52.039 --> 00:34:00.640
bad guys preaching loves the morality tale. Hey, are you

509
00:34:00.720 --> 00:34:04.359
being like this? You should feel really bad. Stop doing

510
00:34:04.359 --> 00:34:06.480
it now, be good. Now, come down to the altar,

511
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:10.239
and let's see how many people we can get down

512
00:34:10.239 --> 00:34:13.440
to the altar, because then that demonstrates the success of

513
00:34:13.480 --> 00:34:16.519
my sermon. Or even if you don't do an alter call,

514
00:34:16.880 --> 00:34:21.719
still becomes very pragmatic, very practical. It's not dealing with

515
00:34:21.760 --> 00:34:29.719
the complexities of it at all. Now, honestly, in your

516
00:34:29.840 --> 00:34:34.079
Christian life, how many times have you heard the Bible

517
00:34:34.119 --> 00:34:38.199
handled as a morality tale? How many times have you

518
00:34:38.280 --> 00:34:47.199
been guilty of reading it as a morality tale? And

519
00:34:47.280 --> 00:34:50.880
what do you think has been the negative consequences and

520
00:34:51.000 --> 00:35:06.280
your spiritual life when it comes to truly understanding the text. Now,

521
00:35:06.320 --> 00:35:08.920
am I saying there aren't any moral lessons. I'm not

522
00:35:08.960 --> 00:35:13.280
saying there's not moral lessons, but the moral lessons must

523
00:35:13.320 --> 00:35:18.199
be understood in light of the fuller context, the fuller narrative.

524
00:35:18.360 --> 00:35:22.119
The narratives don't just stop like enscene boom. They lived

525
00:35:22.159 --> 00:35:26.960
happily ever after, No, you may be ending that scene,

526
00:35:27.079 --> 00:35:29.960
but you can't let people walk away thinking that that's

527
00:35:30.000 --> 00:35:32.519
the definition of who that person was. There's more to

528
00:35:32.679 --> 00:35:35.960
that person. There's more to David than oh, he just

529
00:35:35.960 --> 00:35:38.960
wouldn't kill Saul. There. You have to at least understand

530
00:35:39.000 --> 00:35:40.920
that action and a lot of what he does in

531
00:35:40.960 --> 00:35:43.599
the very next chapter. Why is he killing these people

532
00:35:43.599 --> 00:35:48.599
but he wouldn't kill him? Why now see that? Now?

533
00:35:48.800 --> 00:35:51.559
Instead of turning it into a morality, tell, now we've

534
00:35:51.559 --> 00:35:53.320
got to answer this deeper question to see if we

535
00:35:53.360 --> 00:35:54.840
can figure it out. I'm not saying we have a

536
00:35:54.840 --> 00:35:57.920
good answer, but maybe there's a reason. Wait wait, wait,

537
00:35:58.119 --> 00:36:00.960
why would God put everyone to sleep here? But he

538
00:36:01.000 --> 00:36:03.719
doesn't He didn't intervene here. Now we got deeper quest.

539
00:36:03.800 --> 00:36:06.039
If we turn it into a morality, tell, we don't

540
00:36:06.079 --> 00:36:07.840
care about any of those things. We don't care about

541
00:36:07.840 --> 00:36:10.239
the complexity, we don't care about the purpose, we don't

542
00:36:10.239 --> 00:36:13.119
care about the text. We just need good guy, bad guy,

543
00:36:13.360 --> 00:36:16.199
good actions, bad actions. Don't do this, do this, don't

544
00:36:16.199 --> 00:36:18.760
do this, do this, don't do this, do this. Now

545
00:36:18.960 --> 00:36:26.199
that's good preaching. I think it just completely destroys the

546
00:36:26.239 --> 00:36:30.239
text textually. I think it creates logical problems. And I

547
00:36:30.239 --> 00:36:36.559
could think it creates the logical problems. I'm not saying

548
00:36:36.559 --> 00:36:41.280
that there's not moral lessons, okay, and I'm gonna get

549
00:36:41.480 --> 00:36:46.679
but I teach moral lessons to the kids, okay, but

550
00:36:48.960 --> 00:36:51.159
are you doing so at the expense of the text.

551
00:36:52.119 --> 00:36:55.440
Are you giving them really the wrong idea about these people?

552
00:36:58.280 --> 00:37:00.960
Sometimes it's good if you each kids to ask the

553
00:37:01.039 --> 00:37:03.480
kids what do you think about Christianity? What do you

554
00:37:03.519 --> 00:37:07.199
think Christianity is? Explain to me what Christianity is, and

555
00:37:07.280 --> 00:37:12.280
if it's just moralism, moralism, moralism, moralism, moralism, moralism, be good,

556
00:37:12.519 --> 00:37:15.519
don't be bad, be good, don't be bad. Then you

557
00:37:15.639 --> 00:37:17.599
may want to stop and go uh oh, maybe we've

558
00:37:17.639 --> 00:37:20.840
messed up. And then you can have the entire youth

559
00:37:20.960 --> 00:37:25.159
department from teenager to the smaller kids, have a meeting

560
00:37:25.199 --> 00:37:27.079
and say I think we may have a problem. Now

561
00:37:27.119 --> 00:37:31.400
they'll probably won't listen to you. But because I think

562
00:37:31.480 --> 00:37:33.840
in some cases, parents just want their kids to go

563
00:37:33.840 --> 00:37:35.639
to Sunday school so they learn to be good boys

564
00:37:35.679 --> 00:37:39.920
and good girls to make their lives easier. Some parents

565
00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:41.760
just want their kids to be involved in youth group

566
00:37:41.840 --> 00:37:43.639
so they'll learn to be good, and they won't smoke,

567
00:37:44.039 --> 00:37:46.159
they won't smoke dope, and they won't listen to rock

568
00:37:46.239 --> 00:37:49.320
and roll, and they won't be caught, you know, at

569
00:37:49.360 --> 00:37:53.079
midnight with their girlfriend. They just want them to be good.

570
00:37:53.199 --> 00:38:03.519
They just want them to be good. We just want morality, morality, morality.

571
00:38:03.840 --> 00:38:10.000
All right, Thanks for listening. We'll talk about it more,

572
00:38:10.239 --> 00:38:12.880
probably at some point, but I wanted to at least look,

573
00:38:13.039 --> 00:38:15.480
if you did not listen to part one, part two

574
00:38:15.679 --> 00:38:18.199
of the Spear, Part one, Part two, that's the sermon

575
00:38:18.440 --> 00:38:21.199
that that's why we're still addressing for Samuel twenty six.

576
00:38:21.440 --> 00:38:23.559
I just always assume people have listened to everything before.

577
00:38:23.599 --> 00:38:25.480
If you haven't been a part of this, go listen

578
00:38:25.519 --> 00:38:28.199
to the Spear, Part one, Part two. Then you'll realize

579
00:38:28.199 --> 00:38:30.840
everything we've been discussing. All right, That's why I'm not

580
00:38:30.920 --> 00:38:33.480
sitting there going back reading everything in first Samuel twenty six.

581
00:38:33.559 --> 00:38:36.400
But first Samuel twenty six we reviewed a sermon on that,

582
00:38:36.559 --> 00:38:39.039
and that's where all of this has been a rising from.

583
00:38:39.159 --> 00:38:41.280
All right, thanks for listening, everyone, Have a good evening.

584
00:38:41.440 --> 00:38:41.960
God bless