Aug. 22, 2024

Charles Finney: The Atonement

Charles Finney: The Atonement

We look at the teaching of Charles Finney on the atonement.

Spreaker podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
Amazon Music podcast player badge
Overcast podcast player badge
Audible podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
iHeartRadio podcast player badge
Castbox podcast player badge
Podchaser podcast player badge
TuneIn podcast player badge
Deezer podcast player badge
Pandora podcast player badge
RadioPublic podcast player badge
Podcast Addict podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
YouTube podcast player badge
Fountain podcast player badge
PlayerFM podcast player badge
Goodpods podcast player badge
Podverse podcast player badge
Podyssey podcast player badge
Breaker podcast player badge
Podurama podcast player badge
Audacy podcast player badge
JioSaavn podcast player badge
Spreaker podcast player iconApple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconOvercast podcast player iconAudible podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconiHeartRadio podcast player iconCastbox podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconTuneIn podcast player iconDeezer podcast player iconPandora podcast player iconRadioPublic podcast player iconPodcast Addict podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconYouTube podcast player iconFountain podcast player iconPlayerFM podcast player iconGoodpods podcast player iconPodverse podcast player iconPodyssey podcast player iconBreaker podcast player iconPodurama podcast player iconAudacy podcast player iconJioSaavn podcast player icon

We look at the teaching of Charles Finney on the atonement.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.279 --> 00:00:06.000
Looking at our world from a theological perspective. This is

2
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:12.960
the Theology Central podcast making Theology Central. Good morning everyone.

3
00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:16.920
It is Thursday, August the twenty second, twenty twenty four.

4
00:00:17.399 --> 00:00:21.079
It is currently ten twenty three am Central Time, and

5
00:00:21.160 --> 00:00:24.280
I am coming to you live from the Theology Central

6
00:00:24.359 --> 00:00:30.559
studio located right here in Abilene, Texas. Now, the gold

7
00:00:30.600 --> 00:00:35.439
today was to turn on this microphone, go live and

8
00:00:35.759 --> 00:00:39.640
finish up our look at this article and the Sort

9
00:00:39.640 --> 00:00:42.920
of the Lord newspaper. Remember the June to seventh, twenty

10
00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:45.119
twenty four edition of the Sort of the Lord newspaper

11
00:00:45.359 --> 00:00:49.880
had an article entitled the Holy Spirit and Revival. And

12
00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:55.280
we have one small section to go, one small section.

13
00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:58.200
I probably could knock it out in fifteen to twenty minutes,

14
00:00:58.240 --> 00:01:00.280
maybe twenty five minutes if we do just kind of

15
00:01:00.280 --> 00:01:02.679
a you know, if I add some thoughts or kind

16
00:01:02.679 --> 00:01:06.879
of summarize, you know, there's not much there. I could

17
00:01:06.920 --> 00:01:09.560
really finish it in a relatively short amount of time.

18
00:01:09.840 --> 00:01:13.400
But it's the final section. Now, the sermon itself, this

19
00:01:13.400 --> 00:01:17.640
this article, it's a printed sermon, has been somewhat frustrating,

20
00:01:17.640 --> 00:01:20.400
but it has given us the opportunity to discuss some

21
00:01:20.519 --> 00:01:23.680
very important points about the Book of Acts, how people,

22
00:01:24.560 --> 00:01:28.560
you know, twist and misuse and just kind of pick

23
00:01:28.599 --> 00:01:32.040
whatever they want from the Book of Acts without considering context.

24
00:01:32.079 --> 00:01:35.640
And we talked about that. We discussed just there. There

25
00:01:35.680 --> 00:01:38.480
are a lot of the concepts about revival. I really

26
00:01:38.480 --> 00:01:40.400
struggle with a lot of the way a lot of

27
00:01:40.719 --> 00:01:43.920
Christians talk about it. And while we were looking at

28
00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:48.159
this article and the sort of the Lord newspaper about revival, remember,

29
00:01:48.239 --> 00:01:53.439
I came across a message a broadcast on the Sermon's

30
00:01:53.439 --> 00:01:57.120
two point zero app entitled how the Heresy of Charles

31
00:01:57.159 --> 00:02:02.560
Finny shaped America? How the Heresy of Charles Finny shaped America?

32
00:02:03.040 --> 00:02:06.359
And the broadcasters Reformation Baptist Church. I told everyone to

33
00:02:06.359 --> 00:02:08.680
go listen to the rest of it, How the heresy

34
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:13.759
of Charles Finni shaped America, Reformation Baptist Church. And we

35
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:17.400
did a little discussion about Charles Finnie, right, I went

36
00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:20.080
a little bit through his history. And the most important

37
00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:24.680
thing to understand is that how most Christians today talk

38
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:29.280
about revival. How I can't say most how many Christians

39
00:02:29.280 --> 00:02:33.159
today talk about revival, It is more influenced by Charles

40
00:02:33.159 --> 00:02:39.680
Finny than it is scripture. Charles Finny has absolutely influenced

41
00:02:39.759 --> 00:02:44.240
the minds of many Christians from many different theilological backgrounds.

42
00:02:44.360 --> 00:02:48.599
When they discuss revival, it's coming from Charles Finnie, and

43
00:02:48.759 --> 00:02:54.840
Charles Finny had very heretical teachings. Now, when we were

44
00:02:54.879 --> 00:02:59.439
reviewing this audio, do you remember how it started? Do

45
00:02:59.479 --> 00:03:03.439
you remember or how it started? You don't? Okay, well,

46
00:03:03.439 --> 00:03:06.800
I'm gonna play how this broadcast? Remember it was entitled

47
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:10.080
how the Heresy of Charles Finnish shaped America by Reformation

48
00:03:10.199 --> 00:03:13.159
Baptist Church. You can find it on the sermon's two

49
00:03:13.199 --> 00:03:16.680
point oh app Please go listen to it, Please download it,

50
00:03:16.759 --> 00:03:20.080
please listen to all of it. All right, but do

51
00:03:20.120 --> 00:03:22.919
you remember how it started? It started in such a

52
00:03:22.960 --> 00:03:25.080
way that made me immediately go whoa wait, wait, wait,

53
00:03:25.120 --> 00:03:28.919
time out. Let's be careful here, Let's check a few things.

54
00:03:29.439 --> 00:03:31.599
Do you remember? All right? Well, let me let me

55
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:34.000
play it. Here is what they said. This is how

56
00:03:34.000 --> 00:03:35.240
they started their broadcast.

57
00:03:36.840 --> 00:03:39.120
Tolls finnya is in hell. So why do so many

58
00:03:39.240 --> 00:03:41.840
churches continue to use his techniques?

59
00:03:45.599 --> 00:03:47.360
Did you hear that? Do you mean to play that

60
00:03:47.599 --> 00:03:50.319
one more time? Let me play that one more time?

61
00:03:50.360 --> 00:03:51.280
You ready? Here we go?

62
00:03:52.599 --> 00:03:54.879
Tolls finnya is in Hell, So why do so many

63
00:03:54.960 --> 00:03:57.599
churches continue to use his techniques.

64
00:04:00.680 --> 00:04:05.280
They come in with both beryls blazing, Charles Finny is

65
00:04:05.479 --> 00:04:11.479
in Hell. They made an absolute, dogmatic assertion. I tried

66
00:04:11.520 --> 00:04:13.400
to be a little careful. I was like, well, we

67
00:04:13.479 --> 00:04:16.680
do know Charles Finny believed this. We do know he

68
00:04:16.720 --> 00:04:19.079
believed in the Trinity, he believed in the deity of Christ,

69
00:04:19.279 --> 00:04:23.680
he believed in in the necessity of Christ for atonement.

70
00:04:23.879 --> 00:04:27.959
All right, So so I kind of tried to say, well, look,

71
00:04:28.000 --> 00:04:31.720
we can say his teachings were heretical. Absolutely, his teachings

72
00:04:31.720 --> 00:04:36.680
were wrong. Absolutely, his teaching has influenced a good portion

73
00:04:37.000 --> 00:04:41.839
of Christianity even today, and that influence is wrong. It's corrupt,

74
00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:45.480
and churches should reject everything from Charles Finny. I can

75
00:04:45.560 --> 00:04:47.759
agree with all of that. But I was a little

76
00:04:47.879 --> 00:04:53.560
hesitant about in Hell. I was really, I was. I was.

77
00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:58.399
I was very I was very concerned about going that far.

78
00:04:58.439 --> 00:05:01.759
But as always, whenever I hear something, even if I

79
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:05.000
immediately reject it, you know, I'm going to continue to

80
00:05:05.079 --> 00:05:07.480
study it. You know I'm going to continue. I will

81
00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:10.639
even even though I may be at the outset one

82
00:05:10.680 --> 00:05:13.720
hundred percent disagree, and I may have to remember when

83
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:16.759
I do reviews, I don't listen to things first, right,

84
00:05:17.160 --> 00:05:21.399
I'm reviewing and you know, reacting in real time. There.

85
00:05:21.839 --> 00:05:24.759
I love that because it makes it very real, very organic.

86
00:05:24.800 --> 00:05:28.360
It's not overly produced. It's it's just a person listening

87
00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:32.000
to sermons talking to you about them. But I have

88
00:05:32.079 --> 00:05:35.040
to react. So sometimes I may react and kind of

89
00:05:35.079 --> 00:05:37.600
push back, and then I have to just rely on

90
00:05:37.639 --> 00:05:40.600
the spot my knowledge of whatever the subject is. They're

91
00:05:40.600 --> 00:05:45.199
talking about church history, theology, interpreting a text, So I mean,

92
00:05:45.199 --> 00:05:46.920
there's a lot going on in the middle of a

93
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:49.199
live broadcast when we're doing one of these reviews. But

94
00:05:49.800 --> 00:05:52.560
please note, and hopefully if you've been listening to me

95
00:05:52.879 --> 00:05:55.199
for any length of time, you everyone should know this.

96
00:05:55.759 --> 00:05:58.879
I may argue against you, i may disagree with you,

97
00:05:59.120 --> 00:06:02.279
but I'm always going to go back and continue to

98
00:06:02.480 --> 00:06:07.519
study because I always take my past conclusions and throw

99
00:06:07.639 --> 00:06:11.079
them aside for a present study. Because if my past

100
00:06:11.160 --> 00:06:13.800
conclusions were wrong, well then I don't want to be

101
00:06:13.800 --> 00:06:16.680
wrong in the present. So I always challenged myself again.

102
00:06:17.040 --> 00:06:19.920
So here I was kind of like, well, it's Charles

103
00:06:19.959 --> 00:06:23.319
Finny in Hell, So I kept reading and kept looking,

104
00:06:23.360 --> 00:06:29.759
and I saw something about Charles Finnie rejecting substitutionary atonement.

105
00:06:30.560 --> 00:06:33.759
Now I remember, it's been I don't even know how

106
00:06:33.759 --> 00:06:37.399
many years, maybe fifteen, twenty, maybe even twenty five years.

107
00:06:37.839 --> 00:06:40.079
It's been a long time because I kept hearing people

108
00:06:40.079 --> 00:06:43.240
talk about Finny, Finny Finny, and I did a lot

109
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:45.720
of initial study at that time, and I came to

110
00:06:45.759 --> 00:06:50.120
a conclusion that Finny was a heretic. I mean, I

111
00:06:50.480 --> 00:06:53.639
definitely I may have even been more condemning than I

112
00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:56.120
am today, because I just always get nervous when we

113
00:06:56.160 --> 00:06:59.560
just say that person is in hell, because who are

114
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:02.839
we to make that judgment? Now we can judge the teaching,

115
00:07:02.920 --> 00:07:06.120
we can critique the teaching, and obviously, if they reject

116
00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:09.920
the deity of Christ, reject the try you and God.

117
00:07:09.959 --> 00:07:13.600
Where you're rejecting the true God, if you're rejecting salvation

118
00:07:13.680 --> 00:07:16.680
by grace alone, through faith alone, if you're we can

119
00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.560
I mean, there's some philological tests that we know we

120
00:07:19.639 --> 00:07:23.680
can look to. So I maybe in the past I

121
00:07:23.720 --> 00:07:26.399
came to the same conclusion, but I just I try

122
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:28.959
to be very careful about claiming someone is in hell.

123
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:32.160
I think we should always be careful but today I

124
00:07:32.199 --> 00:07:38.639
saw something about Charles Finni rejecting substitutionary atonement, and I'm like, well,

125
00:07:38.639 --> 00:07:42.600
wait a minute. So I've read some things so about

126
00:07:42.639 --> 00:07:45.800
his belief in atonement, and now I've read other things.

127
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:51.639
So what is the possible truth about Finny on substitutionary atonement?

128
00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:55.920
Because I think maybe we could get closer to well,

129
00:07:56.079 --> 00:08:00.720
what was the reality of Charles Finney's salvation? Can we

130
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.839
even know? Well? So I did a little research, and

131
00:08:03.920 --> 00:08:06.879
here's what I have found. Now we need to continue

132
00:08:06.879 --> 00:08:10.319
to do research. Don't take this as you know, continue

133
00:08:10.360 --> 00:08:13.759
to do your own. But here is what I found.

134
00:08:14.519 --> 00:08:18.279
All right, here is what I found. Are you ready?

135
00:08:18.519 --> 00:08:27.079
Here we go? Here we go. First paragraph. Charles Finny

136
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:34.200
rejected the traditional doctrine of substitutionary atonement, which is the

137
00:08:34.279 --> 00:08:39.200
belief that Jesus Christ died as a substitute for sinners,

138
00:08:39.799 --> 00:08:45.879
bearing the punishment that they deserved, thereby satisfying God's justice.

139
00:08:45.919 --> 00:08:50.960
This doctrine is central to Orthodox Christian theology, particular and

140
00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:56.600
particularly and Reformed and Evangelical traditions. I would say it, Look,

141
00:08:57.080 --> 00:09:02.039
if you reject substitutionary atonement, I just that's not Christianity.

142
00:09:01.840 --> 00:09:04.440
You may want to claim Christianity, but that's not Christianity.

143
00:09:04.440 --> 00:09:07.600
If you reject substitutionary atonement, you no, you should not

144
00:09:07.679 --> 00:09:10.960
be considered a Christian. You're creating a new religion.

145
00:09:11.320 --> 00:09:11.559
I mean.

146
00:09:11.639 --> 00:09:14.080
Christianity is about the fact that God is holy, and

147
00:09:14.120 --> 00:09:17.000
that we are sinners, and that we cannot save ourselves.

148
00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:21.720
We are helpless, hopeless, there's nothing we can do. God

149
00:09:21.799 --> 00:09:25.840
sent his son, His son keeps the law on our

150
00:09:25.919 --> 00:09:29.519
behalf because we cannot keep it, saved or unsaved, and

151
00:09:29.559 --> 00:09:34.159
then he goes to the cross. Then my sins, my

152
00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:41.440
law breaking, my corruption is imputed or accredited, is placed

153
00:09:41.480 --> 00:09:44.960
upon Christ, and a sense it's imputed to him. God

154
00:09:45.039 --> 00:09:48.679
pours out his wrath on his son. Christ serves as

155
00:09:48.720 --> 00:09:52.639
a propitiation, satisfying that wrath. And then by my putting

156
00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:55.399
my faith in Him, my sins are paid for, My

157
00:09:55.440 --> 00:09:59.519
sins are forgiven. And then as my sin was imputed

158
00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:03.360
to Christ, his obedience and righteousness is imputed to me.

159
00:10:03.799 --> 00:10:07.120
And then I stand perfect, righteous and holy. I stand

160
00:10:07.159 --> 00:10:11.200
as a new creature in Christ Jesus, not in practice.

161
00:10:11.399 --> 00:10:13.960
This is because I'm saved by an imputed righteousness, not

162
00:10:14.039 --> 00:10:18.559
an infused righteousness, but he is my substitution. He's my substitution.

163
00:10:18.919 --> 00:10:25.799
He provides atonement, He's he's the substitution, substitutionary atonement for sinners.

164
00:10:27.240 --> 00:10:30.919
That's like central to Christianity. If you don't have that,

165
00:10:31.000 --> 00:10:35.200
you don't have Christianity, you have something else. And according

166
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:38.440
to this Finny rejected that traditional doctrine. Well, if he

167
00:10:38.519 --> 00:10:42.360
rejected that traditional doctrine, ladies and gentlemen, remember when I

168
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:45.120
kind of give a pushback on that where it says

169
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.320
Charles Finney is in hell. They may have been one

170
00:10:48.360 --> 00:10:51.639
hundred percent right. Let's read a little bit more about this.

171
00:10:51.720 --> 00:10:57.360
Here's Finny's view of the atonement. According to one source,

172
00:10:58.279 --> 00:11:02.039
Charles Finny taught what is known as the moral government

173
00:11:02.360 --> 00:11:10.399
theory of atonement, the moral government theory of atonement. Now

174
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:13.799
you may be asking what is the moral government theory.

175
00:11:14.919 --> 00:11:19.159
Finny subscribed to what is known as the moral government

176
00:11:19.440 --> 00:11:24.000
theory of the atonement. According to this view, the atonement

177
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:29.519
was not about Christ's substitution, substituting himself for sinners and

178
00:11:29.600 --> 00:11:33.519
bearing the punishment. Instead, it was about God demonstrating his

179
00:11:33.639 --> 00:11:37.600
displeasure with sin and upholding the moral order of the universe.

180
00:11:37.919 --> 00:11:43.279
The death of Christ served as a public demonstration or

181
00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:51.679
moral example deter sin and encourage righteousness, rather than a

182
00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:57.240
payment of debt ode to God. I want you to

183
00:11:57.320 --> 00:12:01.440
hear that again. Is this now? This is completely not orthodox,

184
00:12:01.600 --> 00:12:04.720
This is completely heretical. And this to me puts Finny

185
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:10.360
outside of Christianity, meaning he wasn't a Christian. Therefore, I

186
00:12:10.360 --> 00:12:13.600
think it would be possibly fair to say, if Christianity

187
00:12:13.679 --> 00:12:15.960
is true, Charles Finny is in hell. And I think

188
00:12:16.000 --> 00:12:20.200
it also demonstrates every church utilizing the techniques and the

189
00:12:20.200 --> 00:12:23.440
philosophies and the ideas about revival that came from Charles

190
00:12:23.440 --> 00:12:28.240
FINNI you're using your ideas of revival that came from

191
00:12:28.279 --> 00:12:35.399
a lost person. And I was recommended Charles Finny and

192
00:12:35.759 --> 00:12:39.360
told about Finny countless times whenever they would talk about revivals.

193
00:12:39.480 --> 00:12:43.159
All right, so let's let's read this again. I want

194
00:12:43.159 --> 00:12:44.919
to make sure you have this down today. I want you,

195
00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:46.600
I want you to I want you to do your

196
00:12:46.639 --> 00:12:49.559
own research on this. All right, here we go. Finny

197
00:12:49.600 --> 00:12:52.919
subscribed to what is known as the moral government theory

198
00:12:53.000 --> 00:12:58.159
of the Atonement. According to this view, the Atonement was

199
00:12:58.200 --> 00:13:02.919
not about Christ substituting himself for sinners and bearing their punishment. Instead,

200
00:13:02.960 --> 00:13:06.200
it was about God demonstrating his displeasure with sin and

201
00:13:06.320 --> 00:13:09.879
upholding the moral order of the universe the death of Christ.

202
00:13:09.879 --> 00:13:12.559
According to the moral government theory, the death of Christ

203
00:13:12.879 --> 00:13:16.960
served as a public demonstration or moral example to deter

204
00:13:17.200 --> 00:13:20.399
sin and encourage righteousness, rather than a payment of debt

205
00:13:20.519 --> 00:13:24.440
owed to God. Basically, Christ's death was simply a moral example.

206
00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:28.480
He wasn't paying for sin. It was just a moral example,

207
00:13:28.679 --> 00:13:31.120
so it would deter you from sin and cause you

208
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:40.759
to pursue righteousness. That is literally not Christianity. Finny argued

209
00:13:41.159 --> 00:13:44.480
that the idea of penal substitution, where Christ suffers the

210
00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:48.759
exact punishment that sinners deserved, was inconsistent with the nature

211
00:13:48.799 --> 00:13:53.120
of God's justice. He believed it portrayed God as unjust, because,

212
00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:55.360
in his view, it would be unjust for God to

213
00:13:55.399 --> 00:13:59.799
punish the innocent Christ instead of the guilty. Finny contended

214
00:13:59.799 --> 00:14:04.720
that God's justice couldnot require the punishment of sin. God

215
00:14:04.799 --> 00:14:07.600
could not require the punishment of sin if the sinner

216
00:14:07.639 --> 00:14:12.120
repents and reforms, So as long as the sinner repents

217
00:14:12.159 --> 00:14:17.919
and reforms doesn't need a payment, well, no, we need

218
00:14:17.919 --> 00:14:19.919
a payment, because even if I repent and even if

219
00:14:19.919 --> 00:14:23.600
I reform, Well, that's because see, then you could go

220
00:14:23.679 --> 00:14:31.039
to Finny rejecting original I guess we'll call it original

221
00:14:31.080 --> 00:14:34.360
sin or human depravity. He held to a Pallagian view.

222
00:14:35.440 --> 00:14:40.759
So yeah, so he rejects human depravity, he rejects substitutionary atonement,

223
00:14:41.000 --> 00:14:47.639
he rejects penal substitution. Finny was not a Christian, he

224
00:14:47.720 --> 00:14:50.399
goes on to say. For Finny, the atonement was effective

225
00:14:50.679 --> 00:14:53.720
not because it satisfied God's wrath, but because it provided

226
00:14:53.759 --> 00:14:57.639
a moral influence on humanity. Christ's suffering and death served

227
00:14:57.679 --> 00:15:00.720
as an example that revealed the seriousness of sin and

228
00:15:00.759 --> 00:15:03.159
the links to which God would go to maintain moral order.

229
00:15:03.279 --> 00:15:06.679
It was meant to inspire people to repent and live righteously,

230
00:15:06.919 --> 00:15:10.399
rather than appeasing God's anger. See, Jesus didn't die to

231
00:15:10.440 --> 00:15:13.080
satisfy the wrath of God. He didn't propitiate the wrath

232
00:15:13.120 --> 00:15:16.360
of God. He didn't pay for anything. He simply died

233
00:15:16.679 --> 00:15:19.320
to be an example. So that will like, sin is

234
00:15:19.360 --> 00:15:25.600
really bad and we should be good. And Finney's view

235
00:15:26.159 --> 00:15:29.840
and Finney's view, the atonement made salvation possible, but did

236
00:15:29.840 --> 00:15:33.279
not guarantee it for anyone. He emphasized that individuals must repent,

237
00:15:33.360 --> 00:15:35.799
exercise faith, and lead a holy life in order to

238
00:15:35.799 --> 00:15:39.639
benefit from the Christ's atoning work. This contrast with the

239
00:15:39.720 --> 00:15:42.799
traditional view, where the atonatus sin is an accomplished fact

240
00:15:42.919 --> 00:15:45.679
that directly results in the salvation of those who have

241
00:15:45.840 --> 00:15:51.480
faith in Christ. Finney's rejection of substitutionary atonement was part

242
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:55.120
of his broader departure from traditional reform theology. His views

243
00:15:55.120 --> 00:15:58.200
were influenced by his emphasis on human free will and

244
00:15:58.240 --> 00:16:02.320
moral responsibility. By reject acting substitutionary atonement, Finny placed a

245
00:16:02.320 --> 00:16:05.840
greater emphasis on human response and moral action for the

246
00:16:05.960 --> 00:16:09.840
process of salvation. Finny's views were controversial and led to

247
00:16:09.879 --> 00:16:14.240
significant criticism for those who adhere to traditional doctrines. His

248
00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:19.120
approach to the atonement is considered unorthodox within most historical

249
00:16:19.240 --> 00:16:22.639
Christian traditions, particularly those that emphasize the necessity of christ

250
00:16:23.240 --> 00:16:26.600
substitutionary death for the forgiveness of sins. I'm going to

251
00:16:26.679 --> 00:16:31.960
paraphrase Charles Finnie was not a Christian. Charles Finni did

252
00:16:31.960 --> 00:16:36.799
not teach Christianity. He taught a counterfeit form of Christianity.

253
00:16:37.120 --> 00:16:41.200
His entire understanding of sin of salvation of the atonement,

254
00:16:41.399 --> 00:16:46.320
a penal substitution, substitutionary atonement. All of his views were wrong,

255
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:49.200
all of his views were heretical, all of his views

256
00:16:49.240 --> 00:16:53.879
were corrupt, and therefore everything he promoted should at least,

257
00:16:53.960 --> 00:16:57.200
at the very least be questionable. I think we should

258
00:16:57.200 --> 00:17:00.320
just reject everything that came from Charles Finni. I don't

259
00:17:00.320 --> 00:17:02.799
know how his books are even sold in Christian bookstores,

260
00:17:02.960 --> 00:17:06.359
but they there were. His views on Revival were promoted

261
00:17:06.440 --> 00:17:08.400
over and over and over and over and over and

262
00:17:08.440 --> 00:17:15.440
over and over. So when you hear people talk about Revival,

263
00:17:16.119 --> 00:17:20.000
if what they're saying sounds more like Charles Finnie, then

264
00:17:20.039 --> 00:17:23.480
you know that their views on Revival was being influenced

265
00:17:23.759 --> 00:17:25.960
by a man who was a heretic, who is not

266
00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:31.400
a Christian, and who did not teach Christianity. And so

267
00:17:31.519 --> 00:17:35.279
I wanted to add to this discussion so that I

268
00:17:35.279 --> 00:17:38.279
could be one hundred percent fair, because when when they

269
00:17:38.319 --> 00:17:41.480
said it, I was like, oh, now, to be fair,

270
00:17:42.559 --> 00:17:45.119
they didn't immediately go in because the way they should

271
00:17:45.160 --> 00:17:47.160
have came in is hey, that was that was a

272
00:17:47.200 --> 00:17:50.440
hot introduction, right, we came in with both barrels blazing.

273
00:17:51.480 --> 00:17:55.759
Let us begin by justifying our claim that Charles Finny

274
00:17:55.920 --> 00:17:58.920
is in hell. Here are the five reasons we believe

275
00:17:58.960 --> 00:18:01.000
he is in hell. And then they could immediately went

276
00:18:01.079 --> 00:18:07.960
after he rejected human depravity, he rejected substitutionary atonement, he

277
00:18:08.039 --> 00:18:17.839
rejected penal substitution, and so yes, penal substitution, substitutionary atonement,

278
00:18:17.960 --> 00:18:21.119
and he taught a moral government theory of atonement. They could,

279
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:23.279
I mean, I could break it down for them. That

280
00:18:23.319 --> 00:18:24.640
would have made it a little bit easier, but they

281
00:18:24.680 --> 00:18:27.079
didn't necessarily go directly into that. They did go to

282
00:18:27.160 --> 00:18:31.640
some of his flawed teachings. But some of those teachings,

283
00:18:31.680 --> 00:18:34.039
I kept arguing, does that rise to the level of

284
00:18:34.039 --> 00:18:38.839
someone not being saved? Remember, someone can be saved and

285
00:18:38.880 --> 00:18:41.519
still be wrong phiologically on a lot of issues. Your

286
00:18:41.519 --> 00:18:46.160
theological correctness does not, you know, throw out your salvation,

287
00:18:46.640 --> 00:18:49.160
but you have to have a certain level of things right.

288
00:18:49.559 --> 00:18:52.799
You're trusting in Christ, who died four year sins, Well,

289
00:18:52.960 --> 00:18:58.240
he's not trusting in Christ for his atonement. Christ's death

290
00:18:58.319 --> 00:19:02.759
is just an example. So he's not trusting in Christ

291
00:19:02.839 --> 00:19:06.880
for the forgiveness of sins. I mean, like there's and

292
00:19:06.920 --> 00:19:08.720
when you reject this, now he may try to then

293
00:19:08.799 --> 00:19:11.359
he may have tried to argue and use some different language,

294
00:19:11.440 --> 00:19:15.279
but at the very nature he's rejecting the truth of Christianity.

295
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:23.799
So let's do this. I'm going to open up this.

296
00:19:24.000 --> 00:19:27.440
I'm going to open up the sermon's two point oh app.

297
00:19:27.480 --> 00:19:29.480
I'm going to open up the sermon's two point oh app.

298
00:19:29.799 --> 00:19:33.920
I'm going to go to the discover tab. I'm going

299
00:19:34.000 --> 00:19:46.920
to put moral government theory. Uh huh, all right, we

300
00:19:47.039 --> 00:19:54.160
don't have okay, we don't have much moral government theory.

301
00:19:54.160 --> 00:19:59.000
That doesn't appear to be any messages on that. Okay,

302
00:19:59.079 --> 00:20:04.000
that's that's not good. How many messages are there on

303
00:20:04.319 --> 00:20:20.519
Charles Let's do this Charles Finny. All right, there are, Yeah,

304
00:20:20.559 --> 00:20:23.400
there are a number of sermons on Charles Finnie, a

305
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.359
number of sermons. So here's what I would challenge you

306
00:20:26.400 --> 00:20:31.440
to do for are for the sermons two point oh app.

307
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:35.759
Sermon challenge it is. It is currently Thursday. I would

308
00:20:35.839 --> 00:20:41.319
like you to take Thursday, Friday, Saturday, maybe Sunday. Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday,

309
00:20:41.559 --> 00:20:45.079
and I want you to look up messages on Charles Finnie.

310
00:20:45.559 --> 00:20:48.359
I want you to look up messages on Charles Finny.

311
00:20:48.599 --> 00:20:51.440
We're gonna, we're gonna really add to this, We're gonna,

312
00:20:51.519 --> 00:20:54.759
we're gonna really double down on this. So you may

313
00:20:54.799 --> 00:20:57.960
find sermons that support Charles Finnie, you may find sermons

314
00:20:57.960 --> 00:21:02.359
that reject Charles Finnie. Hopefully you'll get a wide a

315
00:21:02.400 --> 00:21:05.480
lot of different perspective, but it'll be well worth your time,

316
00:21:05.559 --> 00:21:07.640
and it stays true to what we're trying to do

317
00:21:07.680 --> 00:21:09.400
in twenty twenty four is getting people to use the

318
00:21:09.400 --> 00:21:12.200
Sermon's two point oh app. So for those listening on

319
00:21:12.240 --> 00:21:15.079
other platforms, go to the Apple App Store the Google

320
00:21:15.079 --> 00:21:18.039
Play Store. Look for the app Sermons two point zero

321
00:21:19.039 --> 00:21:23.000
Sermons two point oh right, download the app. If you

322
00:21:23.039 --> 00:21:25.440
cannot find the app, you can contact me and I

323
00:21:25.440 --> 00:21:28.160
will help you find it. But find the Sermon's two

324
00:21:28.160 --> 00:21:30.680
point oh app. Go to the discover tab, hit the

325
00:21:30.680 --> 00:21:35.160
little search icon. Type in Charles FINNI boom, and I

326
00:21:35.200 --> 00:21:37.720
don't know exactly how many sermons are here, but there

327
00:21:37.799 --> 00:21:43.720
is a pages here of things underneath that, and and

328
00:21:43.799 --> 00:21:46.839
well just tell me what you find. Just just start listening,

329
00:21:47.039 --> 00:21:51.960
Just start listening, and let's make it Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday.

330
00:21:52.119 --> 00:21:56.920
It's all about Charles Finnie. I think that'll be well

331
00:21:57.279 --> 00:22:02.240
worth your time because and because what I really want

332
00:22:02.319 --> 00:22:06.599
to do though, and just remember my purpose in this

333
00:22:07.559 --> 00:22:11.119
is the more we can see Charles Finny was a heretic,

334
00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:14.359
and the more we can reject him, then the more

335
00:22:14.400 --> 00:22:16.559
it should make us question. So what a lot of

336
00:22:16.559 --> 00:22:18.440
people do is just say, well, Charles Finny was bad

337
00:22:18.640 --> 00:22:21.200
and we move on. But what we have to do

338
00:22:21.279 --> 00:22:23.440
is go, Okay, Charles Finny was bad, he was a heretic,

339
00:22:23.480 --> 00:22:26.319
He's in hell. Now what we have to do is

340
00:22:28.799 --> 00:22:32.279
where is his influence still in the church. Even though

341
00:22:32.319 --> 00:22:35.720
we reject some of his philological understanding about penal substitution,

342
00:22:36.039 --> 00:22:41.599
substitutionary atonement, human depravity. We may reject his false teaching

343
00:22:41.640 --> 00:22:45.359
on that, but many people will still utilize his philosophies

344
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:52.400
and methods and techniques when it comes to revival and evangelism. Now,

345
00:22:52.440 --> 00:22:55.440
I don't think you should be borrowing from any technique,

346
00:22:56.559 --> 00:23:00.880
any philosophy, anything that he would it would give us,

347
00:23:02.079 --> 00:23:05.319
since it's not coming from someone who's even saved. Your

348
00:23:05.359 --> 00:23:10.160
your evangelism, your your revival concepts should not be coming

349
00:23:10.160 --> 00:23:18.519
from a lost person. That that is that's the issue here. Yeah,

350
00:23:18.559 --> 00:23:20.039
I mean, it's easy to go, well, there was someone

351
00:23:20.039 --> 00:23:22.599
who lived in the past. He was very influential, but

352
00:23:22.680 --> 00:23:26.079
he was a heretic. Great now we could ask why

353
00:23:26.200 --> 00:23:29.640
was he so well received? If he was so heretical,

354
00:23:29.680 --> 00:23:32.160
Why was he so well received? I think that's a

355
00:23:32.240 --> 00:23:35.559
very good question. But I'm more concerned with why did

356
00:23:35.599 --> 00:23:39.319
his influence impact all of these generations of Christians after

357
00:23:39.599 --> 00:23:42.200
and they brought that into their so called revival meetings

358
00:23:42.400 --> 00:23:47.119
and their and their evangelist evangelistic techniques. Why why was

359
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:50.759
Charles Vnni so influential at his time and later on,

360
00:23:51.119 --> 00:23:54.359
even though it appears he was straight up a heretic.

361
00:23:54.759 --> 00:23:59.400
Now this means that in many cases, what really impacts Christians,

362
00:23:59.559 --> 00:24:04.119
what really he draws an audience, is not philological correctness.

363
00:24:13.720 --> 00:24:17.319
All right, So there you go. That's what I want

364
00:24:17.359 --> 00:24:19.440
you to do this week. It's Thursday.

365
00:24:21.039 --> 00:24:21.519
Make it a.

366
00:24:21.559 --> 00:24:27.880
Charles Finny weekend. Kick your weekend off today. Tell your family, Hey,

367
00:24:28.119 --> 00:24:31.599
we're gonna have a Charles Finny weekend. And the kids

368
00:24:31.640 --> 00:24:34.640
will be like, yay, you see, you can dress up

369
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:37.839
like people from that time and will reenact some scenes

370
00:24:37.880 --> 00:24:40.799
and okay, and your kids will be like, what is this?

371
00:24:41.240 --> 00:24:45.200
We're having a Charles Finny party. Okay, but no we

372
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:47.799
do we I mean all Christians need to be aware

373
00:24:47.839 --> 00:24:52.240
of who he was. But most importantly, the voice of

374
00:24:52.359 --> 00:25:05.599
Charles Finny still speaks today, possibly inside your church, possibly

375
00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:18.839
and articles about revival. Possibly when you see churches scheduling

376
00:25:18.839 --> 00:25:21.400
a revival service. Hey, we're going to have a re

377
00:25:21.680 --> 00:25:26.880
fall revival, summer revival, winter revival. What is that? The

378
00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:36.200
voice is that the ghost of Charles Finney. All right,

379
00:25:37.799 --> 00:25:42.839
should be a fun weekend. Enjoy. Thanks for listening. I

380
00:25:43.000 --> 00:25:45.160
am and I am thankful. Let me let me make

381
00:25:45.200 --> 00:25:48.440
it very clear. I mean, go back to this good

382
00:25:48.519 --> 00:25:52.240
I'm going to go back to my player here. I'm

383
00:25:52.319 --> 00:25:56.000
very grateful to Reformation Baptist Church for bringing this subject

384
00:25:56.000 --> 00:25:58.319
to life. Please again, go listen to their message. If

385
00:25:58.319 --> 00:26:00.599
you have not finished their message, how the heresy of

386
00:26:00.680 --> 00:26:05.359
Charles Finnish shaped America. Reformation Baptist Church. Please follow them,

387
00:26:05.440 --> 00:26:11.039
subscribe to them. I am very grateful for there. Remember

388
00:26:11.079 --> 00:26:13.920
even when I was first disagreeing with at least some

389
00:26:14.000 --> 00:26:15.759
of that, I was disagreeing with a little bit of

390
00:26:15.799 --> 00:26:18.079
it just because I wanted to be careful. Like Look,

391
00:26:18.079 --> 00:26:20.400
I don't apologize like I would rather turn on the

392
00:26:20.400 --> 00:26:24.039
microphone and go, hey, they ultimately were right and I

393
00:26:24.200 --> 00:26:26.000
was wrong. I got no problem doing that, but I

394
00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:27.799
would always just be I just want to be careful

395
00:26:27.799 --> 00:26:29.880
before I'm like, hey, that person's just not a Christian.

396
00:26:30.160 --> 00:26:32.799
That person's just not a Christian. I wanted to be fair,

397
00:26:32.839 --> 00:26:35.599
but you know, they appear to be I think they

398
00:26:35.640 --> 00:26:37.200
appear to be right. There's no way you can say

399
00:26:37.240 --> 00:26:43.079
someone who rejects substitutionary atone at penal substitution human depravity.

400
00:26:43.200 --> 00:26:45.880
I mean at some point like that can't that can't be.

401
00:26:46.279 --> 00:26:48.839
That can't be Christianity anymore. That can't. I mean, you're

402
00:26:48.880 --> 00:26:53.039
not even believing in Jesus really to pay for your sins,

403
00:26:53.119 --> 00:26:55.119
because well, you don't need payment. You just have to

404
00:26:55.799 --> 00:27:01.039
repent and do better. Jesus just served as a moral example.

405
00:27:01.039 --> 00:27:04.319
And that's yeah. I think I think that that that

406
00:27:04.400 --> 00:27:09.279
crosses the line. And so I'm grateful for Reformation Baptist

407
00:27:09.359 --> 00:27:11.960
Church for bringing it up. Please follow them, listen to

408
00:27:12.000 --> 00:27:17.400
all their messages, and yeah, that's why we listen to

409
00:27:17.440 --> 00:27:20.640
messages because we can be challenged. See, that's why I

410
00:27:20.640 --> 00:27:22.960
love reviewing sermons. A lot of people think I review

411
00:27:23.000 --> 00:27:25.640
sermons just to be critical. I review sermons because that's

412
00:27:25.680 --> 00:27:28.359
how I learned, that's how I'm challenged. And even if

413
00:27:28.400 --> 00:27:30.519
I disagree again, I just want to end with this.

414
00:27:30.759 --> 00:27:34.279
Even when I initially disagree, I never stopped thinking about

415
00:27:34.319 --> 00:27:37.799
it and learning and challenge and allowing myself to be challenged,

416
00:27:38.079 --> 00:27:40.160
because that's the only that's the only way we can grow,

417
00:27:40.200 --> 00:27:42.680
that's the only way we can we can we can change.

418
00:27:42.720 --> 00:27:45.759
So I'm grateful for that, and I'm grateful that I

419
00:27:45.880 --> 00:27:50.680
was able to find his rejection of substitution, substitutionary atonement,

420
00:27:50.720 --> 00:27:54.519
penal substitution. Now, if by any means we find out

421
00:27:54.519 --> 00:27:57.240
that that information is incorrect, I will correct it. I

422
00:27:57.359 --> 00:28:00.960
got no problem issuing corrections fifty times, because what we

423
00:28:01.039 --> 00:28:05.960
care about most is the pursuit of truth, and in

424
00:28:05.960 --> 00:28:08.519
this particular case, what we care about pursuing the truth

425
00:28:08.559 --> 00:28:13.400
of Charles Finny so that we then can find his

426
00:28:13.720 --> 00:28:18.319
influence and modern Christianity today, so that we can weed

427
00:28:18.599 --> 00:28:24.079
it out. Thanks for listening, everyone, Have a great day.

428
00:28:25.599 --> 00:28:26.200
God bless